Financial Plan: Overview
war-on-disease, 1-percent-treaty, medical-research, public-health, peace-dividend, decentralized-trials, dfda, dih, victory-bonds, health-economics, cost-benefit-analysis, clinical-trials, drug-development, regulatory-reform, military-spending, peace-economics, decentralized-governance, wishocracy, blockchain-governance, impact-investing
Most financial plans are complicated because the people writing them are either confused or lying. This one is complicated because moving $27 billion annually from military budgets to disease eradication while generating perpetual returns for investors actually IS complicated.
But the architecture is clean: Raise $1B. Spend it to pass the treaty. Manage $27B+ annually forever.
Three financial pillars. That’s it.
For detailed breakdowns, see the linked documents. For the overview that explains why this works, keep reading.
The Three Financial Pillars
1. Fundraising: How To Raise $1.0B
Instrument: VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bonds
- Target Returns: 272% annually, perpetually
- Structure: Debt instrument, senior to all other claims
- Payout: 10% of all 1% Treaty Fund inflows ($2.72B/year)
- Protection: Bondholders paid before mission spending
- Collateral: $27.2B+ annual treaty revenue stream
- The Pitch: “Invest $1B. Get $2.72B/year. Forever.”
Why This Works
- Simplest pitch in finance: 272% annual returns, perpetual
- Clean $1B target (vs confusing $1.2-2.5B range)
- 10% payout is easy math (vs 5% complex calculations)
- “Forever” beats any finite timeline
- Better returns than any investment in history
Timeline: 12-24 months to raise $1.0B (simplified structure accelerates fundraising)
2. Campaign Budget: How To Spend $1.0B
Detailed Breakdown: Campaign Budget
The one-time “activation energy” to pass a 1% treaty, made affordable through AI and viral mechanics:
| Category | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Global Referendum | Viral referral system ($0.20-2.00/vote tiered), 280M votes, platform development. Scenario analysis: $140M-$406M | |
| Political Lobbying | AI-targeted campaigns (US/EU/G20), Super PACs, MIC conversion, legal/compliance. Outspends pharma + MIC | |
| Reserve Fund | Post-passage transition, contingency buffer |
Key Innovations
- AI does most of the work: 60-80% cost reduction vs traditional campaigns
- Viral mechanics: $0.20/vote vs $5-15 traditional cost per voter
- Strategic focus: 20 high-impact countries, not all 195
- Result: $1B achieves what would cost $2-5B traditionally
Timeline: 36-60 months from first funding to treaty passage
3. Treasury Management: How To Manage $27.2B+ Annually
Once the treaty passes, $27.2B flows annually from military budgets to the 1% Treaty Fund.
Revenue Sources
Primary: 1% treaty ($27.2B annually)
- 100+ nations contribute 1% of military budgets
- Verified via satellite imagery and blockchain receipts
- Penalties for non-compliance enforced via smart contracts
Growth Path
- Year 1-3: 1% treaty ($27.2B)
- Year 4-7: 2% Treaty ($54B) - public demands expansion
- Year 8-10: 5% Treaty ($135B) - exponential success
- Year 10+: 10%+ ($270B+) - war becomes obsolete
Expenditure Allocation
The 1% Treaty Fund uses an 80/10/10 automatic allocation before any funds reach discretionary spending:
| Allocation | Percentage | Annual Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pragmatic Clinical Trials & Platform | Patient subsidies, research, platform | ||
| VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bond Returns | 10% |
$2.72B |
Perpetual investor payments |
| IAB Political Incentives | 10% |
Rewards for supporting legislators |
The Fixed Costs (10% + 10% = 20%)
- VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bond returns: $2.72B annually (10% of treaty inflows)
- IAB political incentives: $2.72B annually (10% of treaty inflows)
- Both are sacred and untouchable (or the system fails)
- Automatically distributed via smart contracts
- 272% annual returns to bondholders
Everything Else (80%): Decided by Wishocracy
Instead of committees, 8 billion humans vote via pairwise comparisons:
“Patient subsidies for cancer trials” vs “Infrastructure for rural access” Swipe to allocate: 70% / 30%
Billions of micro-decisions aggregate into humanity’s true priorities.
Probable Emergent Allocation (based on human nature):
- Patient Subsidies (65-75%): People vote to subsidize their own treatments
- Infrastructure (10-20%): Only as much as necessary to keep platform running
- Research Incentives (10-15%): Prizes for first-to-cure, breakthrough bonuses
- Expansion Campaigns (variable): Growing treasury through bigger treaties
Anti-Corruption Built In
- Can’t bribe 8 billion people
- Can’t capture a system with no center
- Can’t redirect funds without majority vote
- Can’t build $600M headquarters (looking at you, CDC)
Dynamic Patient Subsidies
The revolutionary part: your decentralized institutes of health don’t pay researchers. They subsidize patients.
How It Works
Base Subsidy = Total Treasury ÷ Active Trial Participants
Example with 1M participants:
$27.2B ÷ 1M = $27,000 per patient per year
As more patients join:
5M participants = $5,400 per patient
10M participants = $2,700 per patient
Why This Creates Perfect Incentives
- Patients organize to grow treasury (2% treaty = double subsidies)
- Researchers compete to attract patients (better trials win)
- Insurance companies save money (trials cheaper than chronic care)
- Everyone wants more people in trials (network effects)
Compare to Grant System
- NIH grants: 6 months of proposal writing, committees decide, universities take 40% overhead
- Subsidies via your decentralized institutes of health: Patient wants treatment, joins trial, funds follow automatically, zero overhead
Risk Management
For detailed risk analysis, see Investor Risk Analysis.
Key protections:
- Assurance contracts: Funds escrowed until milestones hit, automatic refund if targets missed
- Milestone-based release: Phased funding tied to platform launch, user growth, and treaty progress
- Downside protection: Even partial treaty adoption ($13B) returns 130% annually to bondholders
- Smart contract security: Multi-sig wallets, time-locked withdrawals, independent audits
- On-chain transparency: All treasury movements public, anyone can audit independently
Summary
| Component | Target | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Raise | VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bonds | |
| Spend | Campaign budget | Referendum + lobbying + platform |
| Manage | $27.2B+/year | 80/10/10 automatic allocation via Wishocracy |
| Return | 272% annually | Perpetual 10% of treaty inflows |
The math: Invest $1B → Get $2.72B/year → Forever.